However, the H.ear on 3 delivers awesome clarity here. Rock - This has to be the closest category so far. The bass is more powerful and maybe a bit too powerful.but of course you can tweak that in the Sony Headphones app. However, I gotta say I feel the soundstage is significantly wider on the XM3's. Deep enough bass but not too much it's overpowering the rest of the music.
For this type of music, the H.ear on 3 performs well. The bass is certainly more powerful on the XM3.Įlectronic - Again both amazing clarity. The difference I can hear now listening to the H.ear on 3 is there seems to be an emphasis on clarity. They are very both very close to max volume. Hip Hop - So when it comes to the overall volume. Watch the Sony H.ear On Sound Test video to see exactly what tracks I used in this review. The Hear On 3 has significantly more.which could arguably make them more comfortable for some people. (In the sound quality section) Another difference here is the size of padding on the ear-cups. Sony says the WH-H910n Hear On 3 headphones can achieve the same sound pressure as conventional 40mm drivers. Whereas on the Hear On 3 there's just a fine netting & the drivers will sit much closer to your ear. If you look closely at the inside of the WH1000X M3 ear-cups, there's a bit of soft foam padding around the driver. Sony has made some tweaks here to help improve the sound delivered by the 25mm drivers. I'll get into that in the sound quality section of the video.Īlthough the Hear on 3 drivers is smaller.
This will of course impact the sound quality and sound stage performance. The Hear on 3 has 25mm drivers and the 1000X M3 has 40mm. The Hinges and the Headband with reinforced plastic are pretty much the same. The location of the voice call might appears to be in a better spot on the Hear on 3.a little be closer than the XM3. But the forward and back NC mics are slightly closer together on the Hear on 3's just behind the hanger. The outer NC mics are in the same spot on the backs of the ear-cups.
0 kommentar(er)
